Thursday, May 22, 2014

Is Superman Circumcised? Howard Stern Weighs In


By REBECCA WALD

Superman has captured the imagination of every generation of American kids since 1938 when he first appeared in Action Comics #1, but leave it to satellite radio celebrity Howard Stern to tackle the really hard questions concerning this American superhero.

Monday’s The Howard Stern Show kicked off with a call-in question from Stern show correspondent Wolfie asking: Is Superman circumcised? “Of course the first question would likely be, how on Krypton would they come up with that barbaric ritual of cutting off a piece of a baby’s skin?” Stern asked. “Now Krypton was a very advanced society, as you know. They were very advanced in science and you would assume that on Krypton they would not practice circumcision,” he continued.

Robin Quivers pondered whether Superman might be able to circumcise himself using his heat vision. To which Stern replied: “Why would any guy want to circumcise himself?”

Stern, who is Jewish, considers male infant circumcision to be barbaric and a mutilation, and supports efforts to make the practice illegal

Questions about the mythical Superman are common among a certain (nerdy) set. Is Superman real? Is Superman immortal? Is Superman faster than Flash? Apparently there is also considerable speculation about Superman’s Jewish roots.

An NYU thesis by adjunct English professor Roy Schwartz attempted to answer the question: Is Superman Jewish? Writing for The Jerusalem Post in 2013, Schwartz noted that the creators of the Superman comic, Jerry Seigel and Joe Shuster, were Jewish and that Superman’s Kryptonian name, Kal-El, has Hebrew roots.


So Superman is Jewish, and he isn’t circumcised. Go figure.

7 comments:

  1. Howard Stern is AWESOME!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was very disappointed when watching the Superman movie with Christopher Reeve that they showed a naked, circumcised boy emerge from the capsule that landed on earth from Krypton.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This site kicks ass. Thank you Rebecca!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Certainly no mortal could circumcise Kal-El. For one thing there is no substance which could cut his Super flesh. And of course there's the pesky bit about holding him down long enough to cut off the most pleasure-receptive part of his penis while he violently resists with Super-human strength.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, he landed in KANSAS as a baby.
    I wonder if John & Martha ever tried to make him "look like other boys", but then fail miserably coz no earthly knife could cut his foreskin.

    ReplyDelete
  6. First of all, a oollection of links to no end of information about circumcision

    http://analytic-comments.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-circumcision-debate-links-and.html

    http://analytic-comments.blogspot.com/2012/10/michael-wolffsohns-foreskin-of-heart.html

    http://www.circumcisioncomplex.com/fundamentals/

    http://eewiki.newint.org/index.php/Is_male_circumcisionyou%3F_bad_for_

    http://academia.edu/1403058/Circumcision_Sabbath_Food_and_Purification_Rites_in_Early_Judaism

    http://analytic-comments.blogspot.com/2012/08/psychotherapeutenyahoogroupsde.html

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2431-13-136.pdf

    Making it a taboo to compare male with female sexual
    mutilation is the biggest scandal of the controversy. In both
    instances the most sensitive and most erogenous zone of the
    human body is amputated and severely damaged. In both
    instances, what counts primarily is the cutting of human
    sexuality. The imposition of control by the patriarchy. A
    good look at a book on embryology will show the development of
    the nerves and tissue and how they are the same.

    What is lacking in all the talk about circumcision is
    discussion of its archeological dimension - that it is the
    left over of human sacrifice. What kind of god is it that
    demands that of an infant? If the Bris constitutes the
    identity of the male, what about the identity of a Jewish
    girl? Or is this an entirely homosexual ceremony?

    Also, unfortunately it is / has been circumcision that
    has MADE for no end of anti-semitic sentiments. Freud found
    that it was the chief reason for unconscious anti-Semitism.
    And the myths surrounding it are at the core of the “blood
    libel.” Thus, it's time to eliminate the Brit Milah because if
    that is the chief reason for being anti-Semitic or
    anti-Abrahamic [Islam too practices the rite] then why hang on
    to this left-over of human sacrifice? that traumatizes the
    child, cutting off 5,000 nerves, that is the equivalent of
    female circumcision in the sense that it eliminates everything
    but the clitoris,and only serves the Ultra Orthodox to
    maintain their power? After all, reform Judaism sought to
    eliminate the rite in the 19th century, and Jewish identity
    depends on being born by a Jewish mother, or converting. Here
    a link to an archive of the entire German and then some
    debate, note especially Michael Wolffsohn's two pieces .
    Circumcision has been controversial also within Jewry forever.

    A wash cloth before and after sex or a clean mouth are
    equally effective and leave the pleasure zones intact! Or
    castration! That would eliminate any kind of danger from that
    source!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow. A reason to like and respect Howard Stern. Who woulda thunk?

    ReplyDelete