By Lisa Braver Moss
Special to Beyond the Bris
If you follow circumcision in the news, you’ve been busy lately. And if you happen to like journalism that’s baffling—well, there’s been plenty to enjoy.
The Atlantic, for example, recently ran a piece about a married couple facing the circumcision decision. Like so many publications, the magazine apparently thought it had to be balanced about the parents’ opposing points of view. The highlighted quote: “We quickly realized that neither of us had any rational reason to feel strongly about the subject.”
Wait, these parents are equally irrational? One thinks baby should be left intact, while the other is advocating for surgery with no medical condition present. Those are both illogical?
Meanwhile, Kera News, part of National Public Radio’s digital network, reports that two groups of Alaska pediatricians are “taking a stand” on circumcision. At first I thought these docs were pointing out the folly of routine surgery on healthy infants, or maybe protesting the recent American Academy of Pediatrics’ statement that as good as endorses circumcision.
No such luck. After concluding that local hospitals’ charges for circumcision were wildly divergent and in some cases exorbitant, the Alaska pediatricians have decided to move the procedure to their private offices.
Then of course, the recent birth of royal baby George across the pond generated a lot of news. The Huffington Post ran a piece speculating about the royals’ imminent decision, and titled it “The Royal Snip.”
Moving along one continent to the south, we have the stranger-than-fiction situation in Africa, where certain progressive communities are working hard to eradicate female genital cutting. Not such a rosy picture for males. Almost every day, throughout Africa’s so-called “circumcision season,” which runs in the summer months, thousands of young boys and men are left sick, mutilated or dying from their rite-of-passage circumcisions. The tragedy taking place in Africa was recently reported in the Wall Street Journal.
There should be an outcry against these deadly practices, as with female genital cutting. Instead, the World Health Organization is working doggedly to circumcise all the men of Africa under the scientifically dubious claim of HIV prevention. Circumcisions performed in clinical settings aren’t necessarily safe, either. Just a few weeks ago, a four-year-old boy died after being circumcised by a doctor in a Johannesburg Medi-Cross clinic.
Often, mainstream journalists don’t even question the premise that mass circumcision is the best option in combating HIV. If it were the best, then why does the U.S., with the highest proportion of circumcised males in the developed world, have more HIV cases per capita than any other developed nation?
In American medical practice alone, there are questions journalists should be asking. For example, circumcision is said to be a safe procedure when done by a trained professional. But how can its safety be claimed when no systematic study has ever been done on its risks? Also, reporters often mention the potential health benefits of circumcision with no reference to its drawbacks—i.e., without explaining that studies have now established the sexual nature, and physiological function, of foreskin tissue.
And how many babies die from circumcisions each year? Such deaths appear to be very rare in the U.S., but incredibly, they’ve often been attributed to secondary causes such as sepsis and hemorrhage rather than to their actual cause. That’s quite a statement about first-world medicine—and quite a scoop for an enterprising journalist. So where’s the story?
Look, I’m not an investigative reporter. But many of the news articles about circumcision wouldn’t pass muster in Journalism 101. “Dig deeper,” the instructor might say. “I don’t buy this; what are you leaving out?” “Remember the five ‘w’s.” “Um, have you considered a different major?”
As for me—I did consider a different major. An English major. And eventually, I wrote a novel called The Measure of His Grief. It’s about Jewish doctor who experiences a strange flashback, and ends up waging an anti-circumcision campaign—and then, pursuing foreskin restoration. As outlandish as all this may sound, I guarantee there aren’t nearly as many loose ends as there are in typical news stories on the topic. The Measure of His Grief is available in paperback, and it’s just come out on Kindle!
Now that’s good news.
Absolutely Lisa! Excellent piece about shoddy, below-standard journalism. 'Where's the real story?' The whole bizarre, disturbing area of human experience that includes the terrorizing and cutting of children's genitals offers up such a catalogue of potential themes for serious journalism- at every angle there's another dimension to this horrible phenomenon. You'd barely think so from the mainstream media though. One thing I have noticed, though, is when online publications allow commenting on articles, poorly researched and bias articles are immediately and sounded rebuked by critical thinkers, most of them clearly intactivists! A great development.
Another brilliant piece, Lisa! Thank you for your thoughtful words and your sound advice! Both are so needed in our work to protect the babies.
If you haven't read Lisa's book, you'll find it a fascinating read.